Cases 41 - 50 of 5,478
Flores v. Unnamed State Officials
as 3:2017cv03050
Plaintiff:
Eric Flores
Defendant:
Unnamed State Officials, Bryan Collier, Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
George Carter v. Brad Livingston, Director, et al
as 17-50947
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE L. CARTER
Defendant - Appellee:
BRAD LIVINGSTON, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, JOE GRIMES, Director of Prison and Jail Operations for Region IV and others
Alexander Baldomino v. William Stephens, et al
as 17-20619
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALEXANDER BALDOMINO
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, OFFICER GONZALES, OFFICER RAPHER and others
Moses Smith, Jr. v. William Stephens, et al
as 17-40928
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MOSES SMITH, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN WILLIAM STEPHENS, B. PARKER, GARY HUNTER and others
McClure v. Texas Court of Criminal Appeals et al
as 1:2017cv00842
Defendant:
Elsa Alcala, Rudolph Brothers, Joseph Buttitta and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Troy McClure
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Stephens
as 9:2017cv00147
Petitioner:
Ronrico A Williams
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hardin v. Stephens
as 1:2017cv00615
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Kevin Todd Hardin
Respondent:
Director William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mack v. TDCJ-CID et al
as 6:2017cv00345
Plaintiff:
Craig Mack
Defendant:
TDCJ-CID, UTMB, Internal Affairs Division and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Stephens
as 3:2017cv01497
Petitioner:
Michael Quincy White
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jose Olive v. William Stephens, et al
as 17-10580
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE MANUEL OLIVE
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, KIETH GENTRY, JOE MILBERN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
