Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00575
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00635
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Stevens v. Safeport Insurance Company
as 2:2023cv01009
Plaintiff:
William Stevens
Defendant:
Safeport Insurance Company
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Tawe v. Davis et al
as 4:2017cv03469
Plaintiff:
Richard N. Tawe
Defendant:
Lorie Davis, Bryan Collier, Oliver J. Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGrew v. USA
as 3:2017cv00560
Petitioner:
William Steven McGrew, Sr
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Burleson v. State of Texas et al
as 1:2017cv00041
Petitioner:
Samuel Burleson
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
State of Texas and William Stevens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burleson v. State of Texas et al
as 1:2017cv00042
Petitioner:
Samuel Burleson
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
State of Texas and William Stevens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burleson v. Estelle Unit
as 4:2016cv01804
Plaintiff:
Samuel Burleson
Respondent:
Estelle Unit
Defendant:
Tiffany A. Benson, Gaye L. Karriker, William Stevens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lathan v. Stevens et al
as 2:2016cv00147
Plaintiff:
Darryl Lathan
Defendant:
William Stevens, M. Alsobrook and K Gaitan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
