Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Jeffrey Payne v. Department of Social and Health Services, et al
as 22-35506
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFREY PAYNE
Defendant / Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND HEALTH SERVICES, a subdivision of the State of Washington, SPECIAL COMMITMENT CENTER, an agency of DSHS, HENRY RICHARDS and others
Payne v. Department of Social and Health Services et al
as 3:2020cv05950
Defendant:
Department of Social and Health Services, Special Commitment Center, Sjan Talbot and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Samuel Donaghe v. Patrisha Lashway, et al
as 17-35919
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMUEL WILLIAM DONAGHE
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRISHA LASHWAY, JOHN CLAYTON, WILLIAM VAN HOOK and others
Mirelez v. Strong et al
as 3:2017cv05198
Plaintiff:
Timothy Mirelez
Defendant:
Mark Strong , Cathi Harris , Michael Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Azeem v. Strong et al
as 3:2017cv05196
Plaintiff:
Mikaeel Azeem
Defendant:
Mark Strong, Cathi Harris, Michael Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
West v. Strong et al
as 3:2017cv05197
Plaintiff:
Gale Edward West
Defendant:
Mark Strong , Cathi Harris , Michael Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brogi v. Strong et al
as 3:2017cv05199
Plaintiff:
Curtis Brogi
Defendant:
Mark Strong , Cathi Harris , Michael Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Strong et al
as 3:2017cv05200
Plaintiff:
Michael Martin
Defendant:
Mark Strong , Cathi Harris , Michael Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. Strong et al
as 3:2017cv05162
Plaintiff:
Gary Shaw
Defendant:
Mark Strong , Cathi Harris , Michael Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Strong et al
as 3:2017cv05163
Plaintiff:
Dale Davis
Defendant:
Mark Strong, Cathi Harris, Michael Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
