Cases 1 - 10 of 10
B. Williams v. The William Warren Group Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02687
Defendant:
The William Warren Group Inc. a California Corporation individually also known as WWG Team doing business as StorQuest Self Storage, Bill Hobin individually, and in his official capacity as CEO Ownder Principal Mgr. Chairman of the William Warren Group, individually doing business as StorQuest Self Storage also known as William Warren Hobin, StorQuest Self Storage individually a California Corporation also known as WWG Team doing business as StorQuest Self Storage doing business as The William Warren Group, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
B. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
We 2 Corp. et al v. City and County of San Francisco et al
as 3:2017cv05012
Plaintiff:
We 2 Corp. and William Warren
Defendant:
City and County of San Francisco, American Parking, American Taxi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Taylor v. Hayward Self Storage et al
as 4:2017cv01424
Plaintiff:
Tyrone T. Taylor
Defendant:
Hayward Self Storage, Brinkman Investment, LP, Brinkman Investments, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America v. William Warren Geary, Jr.
as 2:2015cv05266
Defendant:
William Warren Geary, Jr
Plaintiff:
United States of America
United States of America v. William Warren Geary, Jr.
as 8:2015cv01113
Defendant:
William Warren Geary, Jr
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Warren v. Baca et al
as 3:2010cv02554
Plaintiff:
William Warren
Defendant:
Lydia Dianne Baca and Racheal Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
William Warren v. Junaid Fitter et al
as 2:2007cv02091
Plaintiff:
William Warren
Defendant:
Junaid Fitter and K Ofoegbu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Warren v. Junaid Fitter et al
as 2:2007cv00817
Plaintiff:
William Warren
Defendant:
Junaid Fitter and K Ofoegbu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
