Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Catherine McKoy, Marcus Frazier and Lynn Chadwick v. The Trump Corporation and Donald J. Trump
as 24-241
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, LUKE LOE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, RICHARD ROE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
RAJ K. PATEL
Defendant / Appellee:
THE TRUMP CORPORATION, DONALD TRUMP, in his personal capacity, DONALD TRUMP, JR. and others
Catherine McKoy, Marcus Frazier and Lynn Chadwick v. The Trump Corporation and Donald J. Trump
as 24-180
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, LUKE LOE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, RICHARD ROE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LYNN CHADWICK, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,, MARKUS FRAZIER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, and CATHERINE MCKOY, Individually
Defendant / Appellee:
THE TRUMP CORPORATION, DONALD TRUMP, in his personal capacity, DONALD TRUMP, JR. and others
Intervenor:
RAJ K. PATEL
Catherine McKoy, Marcus Frazier and Lynn Chadwick v. The Trump Corporation and Donald J. Trump
as 24-181
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, LUKE LOE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, RICHARD ROE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
RAJ K. PATEL
Defendant / Appellee:
THE TRUMP CORPORATION, DONALD TRUMP, in his personal capacity, DONALD TRUMP, JR. and others
Perkins v. United Surgical Partners
as 23-10375
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Amanda Perkins, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Heather C. Holst, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Terry J. Williams, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
United Surgical Partners International, Inc., Retirement Plan Administration Committee of United Surgical Partners International, Inc. and John Does 1-30
Loretta Williams v. What If Holdings, LLC, et al
as 23-15337
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LORETTA WILLIAMS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
WHAT IF HOLDINGS, LLC, DBA C4R Media Corp. and ACTIVEPROSPECT INC.
IN RE: DEVA CONCEPTS PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
as 22-1142
Plaintiff:
Ginger Dixon, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Alana Hall, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Cristina Napolotano, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
Katherine Robaina
Defendant / Appellee:
Deva Concepts, LLC, DBA DevaCurl
Lee v. Binance
as 22-972
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JD Anderson, Corey Hardin, Eric Lee, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Binance and Changpeng Zhao
Defendant:
Yi He and Roger Wang
David Williams, et al v. Theodore H. Frank
as 22-11232
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DAVID WILLIAMS, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, CAROLL ANGLADE, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, HOWARD CLARK and others
Interested Party:
THEODORE H. FRANK
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Defendant / Appellee:
RECKITT BENCKISER LLC and RB HEALTH (US) LLC
Williams v. Sake Hibachi Sushi & Bar
as 21-11287
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Catherine Williams, Individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated under 29 U.S.C. 216(b)
Defendant / Appellee:
Sake Hibachi Sushi & Bar, Incorporated, Wen Qin Lu, Individually and Amy Chen
Cecilia Webb, et al v. The City of Maplewood
as 21-8012
Respondent:
Cecelia Roberts Webb, Darron Yates, Anthony Lemicy and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Eutz and Krystal Banks
Petitioner:
City of Maplewood
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
