Cases 1 - 10 of 256
Roybal et al v. Schnell
as 0:2024cv01652
Plaintiff:
Kristopher Lee Roybal, Native American Practitioners of their Religious Beliefs confined at M.C.F. Stillwater, the, Lance Lee Houle and others
Defendant:
Paul Schnell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dahir v. Bolin
as 0:2024cv01304
Petitioner:
Mohammed Abdi Dahir
Respondent:
William Bolin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shortymacknifisent v. Schnell et al
as 0:2024cv01280
Petitioner:
Archbishop Kingpimp Shortymacknifisent
Respondent:
Paul Schnell, William Bolin and Keith Ellison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shortymacknifisent v. State of Minnesota For The Actions David S. Doty, The et al
as 0:2024cv01283
Plaintiff:
Archbishop Kingpimp Shortymacknifisent
Defendant:
The State of Minnesota For The Actions David S. Doty, William Bolin and Keith Ellison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Eischen
as 0:2024cv01034
Petitioner:
Zantra Williams
Respondent:
B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williams v. Fritel
as 0:2024cv00779
Plaintiff:
Roberto A. Williams
Defendant:
Mark Fritel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allwine v. Bolin
as 0:2024cv00439
Petitioner:
Stephen Allwine
Respondent:
William Bolin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Bolin
as 0:2024cv00398
Petitioner:
Willie B. Brown
Respondent:
William Bolin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
White v. Stenseth
as 0:2024cv00261
Petitioner:
William Demont White, Jr.
Respondent:
Lisa Stenseth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Saarela v. USA
as 0:2024cv00029
Petitioner:
William Kenneth Saarela, Sr
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
