Other Statutes Cases filed in Tennessee
Cases 41 - 50 of 482
Doe v. Lee et al
as 1:2023cv00027
Plaintiff: John Doe
Defendant: William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #1 v. Lee et al
as 2:2023cv00018
Plaintiff: John Doe #1
Defendant: William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #14 v. Lee et al
as 3:2022cv01075
Plaintiff: John Doe #14
Defendant: William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anthony et al v. Van Over et al
as 3:2022cv00416
Plaintiff: William Anthony, PBA Martial Arts, Inc., Katie Baker and others
Defendant: Barry Van Over, Myles Baker, Brent Seebohm and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Doe #13 v. Lee et al
as 3:2022cv00831
Plaintiff: John Doe #13
Defendant: William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Wheel Recovery Systems, LLC v. Nichols et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00342
Plaintiff: Wheel Recovery Systems, LLC
Defendant: Bruce W. Nichols, Thomas Walters, Roark Cheryl and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Doe #12 v. Lee et al
as 3:2022cv00712
Plaintiff: John Doe #12
Defendant: William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Lee et al
as 3:2022cv00373
Plaintiff: John Doe and Curtis Randall Hodges
Defendant: William Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #11 v. Lee et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00338
Plaintiff: John Doe #11
Defendant: William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Lee et al
as 2:2022cv00012
Plaintiff: John Doe
Defendant: William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?