Cases 1 - 10 of 2,179
Airington v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01717
Plaintiff:
William Airington
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01681
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01664
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Williams et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01639
Plaintiff:
Maria Williams and Teddy Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Roybal et al v. Schnell
as 0:2024cv01652
Plaintiff:
Kristopher Lee Roybal, Native American Practitioners of their Religious Beliefs confined at M.C.F. Stillwater, the, Lance Lee Houle and others
Defendant:
Paul Schnell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keith v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01316
Plaintiff:
William Keith
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Dahir v. Bolin
as 0:2024cv01304
Petitioner:
Mohammed Abdi Dahir
Respondent:
William Bolin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01264
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Shortymacknifisent v. Schnell et al
as 0:2024cv01280
Petitioner:
Archbishop Kingpimp Shortymacknifisent
Respondent:
Paul Schnell, William Bolin and Keith Ellison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shortymacknifisent v. State of Minnesota For The Actions David S. Doty, The et al
as 0:2024cv01283
Plaintiff:
Archbishop Kingpimp Shortymacknifisent
Defendant:
The State of Minnesota For The Actions David S. Doty, William Bolin and Keith Ellison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
