Cases 1 - 10 of 193
Thompson v. Wills et al
as 3:2024cv01248
Plaintiff:
Walter Thompson
Defendant:
Anthony Wills, Walker, Terrance Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lipscomb v. Wills et al
as 3:2024cv01233
Plaintiff:
Keon V. Lipscomb
Defendant:
Anthony Wills, Lieutenant Blake, Lieutenant Chiggy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Merriman et al
as 3:2024cv01138
Plaintiff:
Jarrod Robinson
Defendant:
Jerard Merriman, Amanda Smith, Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schubert v. Avery et al
as 3:2024cv00212
Plaintiff:
Allan Douglas Schubert
Defendant:
Krystal Avery, Shannon W. Phelps, James Wills and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Clarence Britten v. Anthony Wills, et al
as 24-1547
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE BRITTEN
Defendant:
ANTHONY WILLS, Warden, CARRI MORRIS, Leading Social Worker, Menard CC and SHERRI BUETTNER, MHP, Menard CC
Seats v. Doty et al
as 3:2024cv01051
Plaintiff:
Devin C. Seats
Defendant:
B Doty, Anthony Wills and Lt Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steven Murphy v. Mohammed Siddiqui, et al
as 24-1505
Plaintiff:
STEVEN MURPHY
Defendant:
MOHAMMED SIDDIQUI, ANTHONY WILLS and ANGELA CRAIN
Steven Murphy v. Mohammed Siddiqui, et al
as 24-1506
Plaintiff:
STEVEN MURPHY
Defendant:
MOHAMMED SIDDIQUI, Doctor and ANTHONY WILLS
Thompson v. Pritzker et al
as 3:2024cv00966
Plaintiff:
Walter Thompson
Defendant:
J B Pritzker, Latoya Hughes, David Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Wexford Health Source et al
as 3:2024cv00845
Plaintiff:
Jake Williams
Defendant:
Wexford Health Source, Anthony Wills, Connie Dolce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
