Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 513
Clarence Britten v. Anthony Wills, et al
as 24-1547
Plaintiff: CLARENCE BRITTEN
Defendant: ANTHONY WILLS, Warden, CARRI MORRIS, Leading Social Worker, Menard CC and SHERRI BUETTNER, MHP, Menard CC
Johnson v. Wills et al
as 1:2024cv02794
Petitioner: William Johnson
Respondent: Anthony Wills and Kwame Raoul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Seats v. Doty et al
as 3:2024cv01051
Plaintiff: Devin C. Seats
Defendant: B Doty, Anthony Wills and Lt Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steven Murphy v. Mohammed Siddiqui, et al
as 24-1505
Plaintiff: STEVEN MURPHY
Defendant: MOHAMMED SIDDIQUI, ANTHONY WILLS and ANGELA CRAIN
Steven Murphy v. Mohammed Siddiqui, et al
as 24-1506
Plaintiff: STEVEN MURPHY
Defendant: MOHAMMED SIDDIQUI, Doctor and ANTHONY WILLS
Thompson v. Pritzker et al
as 3:2024cv00966
Plaintiff: Walter Thompson
Defendant: J B Pritzker, Latoya Hughes, David Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. SCI PINE GROVE et al
as 2:2024cv00462
Plaintiff: DANE D. TAYLOR
Defendant: SCI PINE GROVE, MARK BROTHERS, JEFFREY PAUL BOLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Davenport v. Baker et al
as 3:2024cv00852
Plaintiff: Kareem Davenport
Defendant: Sergeant Baker, C/O Suhro, C/O Schweizer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Wexford Health Source et al
as 3:2024cv00845
Plaintiff: Jake Williams
Defendant: Wexford Health Source, Anthony Wills, Connie Dolce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reeves v. Wills We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00816
Petitioner: Michael Ray Reeves
Respondent: Anthony Wills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?