Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01247
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03640
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
HARRIS v. KEARNS et al
as 2:2023cv00088
Plaintiff:
Kharie Harris
Defendant:
P/O Kearns, P/O Bacevich, P/O Wills and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
HICKS v. BOROUGH OF NORTHERN CAMBRIA et al
as 3:2022cv00199
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY D. HICKS, JR.
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF NORTHERN CAMBRIA, PATTON BOROUGH, RUSTY WILLS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv03985
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
CHARLES v. HOPE CAFFAE/COFFEE SHOP et al
as 2:2019cv04238
Plaintiff:
PETER CHARLES
Defendant:
BETHESDA PROJECT, STARBUCKS ON 3RD AND SOUTH, HOPE CAFFAE/COFFEE SHOP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MICHAEL v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2018cv04405
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICER CHAD GUGGER, POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOE, POLICE OFFICER HOUSER and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY MICHAEL, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv03678
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SUI JURIS v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2018cv03633
Defendant:
ROBERT J. RADARO, JOHN J. WHELAN, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Plaintiff:
DOMONIQUE JORDAN SUI JURIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01933
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
