Cases 11 - 20 of 3,005
Shah Azad v. John Xu et al
as 2:2024cv02897
Plaintiff:
Shah Azad
Defendant:
John Xu, Tao Han, Alexandria M Lopez and others
(PC) Bennett v. FBI, et al
as 2:2024cv01038
Plaintiff:
David Bennett
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Willis, Henrey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Iseli v. CDCR
as 2:2024cv01041
Petitioner:
Branden Willie Iseli
Respondent:
Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00721
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Benshoof v. United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, Seattle
as 24-1958
Petitioner:
KURT BENSHOOF
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, SEATTLE
Interested Party:
FREYA BRIER, MOSHE ADMON, CITY OF SEATTLE and others
(HC) Iseli v. Lynch
as 2:2024cv00980
Petitioner:
Branden Willie Iseli
Respondent:
Jeff Lynch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Weaver v. Pfeiffer
as 3:2024cv01855
Petitioner:
Willie Weaver
Respondent:
Warden Christian Pfeiffer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
John Suggs et al v. Chiquita Canyon, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv02444
Plaintiff:
John Suggs, John Suggs, Sr., Brittany Suggs and others
Petitioner:
Vahram Boghigian
Defendant:
Chiquita Canyon, LLC, Waste Connections of California, Chiquita Canyon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Haskins et al v. Anderson et al
as 1:2024cv00504
Plaintiff:
Dale Haskins, Linda Haskins and Estate of Dale Haskins
Defendant:
Willie Hampton Anderson and Inter Transport Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
