Cases 31 - 40 of 413
Koehler v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00142
Plaintiff:
Willis Koehler
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Deuser v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00096
Plaintiff:
Willis Deuser
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv02266
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Tabron v. Valentino et al
as 1:2022cv02036
Plaintiff:
Willis Tabron
Defendant:
Ralph Valentino, City of Cleveland and Robert Boldin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rising Biosciences, Inc. et al v. Essential Water Solutions, Inc.
as 3:2022cv01925
Plaintiff:
Rising Biosciences, Inc., Artic Gator Services, LLC, Enviral-Clean, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Essential Water Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03738
Plaintiff:
Willis Smith
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Willis v. Henderson
as 1:2022cv01727
Petitioner:
Courtney Willis
Respondent:
Warden Kim Henderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hicks v. Garfield Heights, Ohio et al
as 1:2022cv01587
Plaintiff:
Willie Hicks and Martaze Burrell
Defendant:
Garfield Heights, Ohio, Ronald Dodge, Peter Stockhausen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alston v. Department of Treasury et al
as 4:2022cv01475
Plaintiff:
Willie J Alston
Defendant:
Department of Treasury and Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McDaniel et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02866
Plaintiff:
Willie McDaniel and Carol McDaniel
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
