Cases 1 - 10 of 63
King v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 5:2023cv01141
Plaintiff:
Carey M King, Tearra King, Deoyon Janae Moore and others
Defendant:
Charles King, Cannady Paries, Deoyonte Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barlean v. Oklahoma County Criminal Justice Authority et al
as 5:2023cv00488
Plaintiff:
Kelly J Barlean
Defendant:
Oklahoma County Criminal Justice Authority, Turn Key Health Clinics LLC, Jesse Childers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Willis v. Sharon LNU
as 6:2022cv00163
Petitioner:
Jamontra D. Willis
Respondent:
Chaplin Sharon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Willis v. Bryant
as 6:2022cv00140
Petitioner:
Jamontra D. Willis
Respondent:
Chris Bryant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Willis v. Crow
as 5:2022cv00092
Petitioner:
Michael Lee Willis
Respondent:
Scott Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burke v. City of Tulsa, Oklahoma et al
as 4:2021cv00131
Defendant:
Matthew Willis, Sarah Kessler, City of Tulsa, Oklahoma and others
Plaintiff:
Taylor Burke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Wade v. Rohrbough et al
as 5:2021cv00101
Defendant:
Barry Rohrbough, Javier Martinez and Stephens County Detention Center
Plaintiff:
Timothy Willis Wade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Booker v. Farris
as 4:2020cv00526
Respondent:
Tulsa County District Court and Jim Farris
Petitioner:
Willie Lee Booker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Commander v. Pettigrew
as 6:2020cv00319
Respondent:
United States of America and Luke Pettigrew
Petitioner:
James Willis Commander
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Boyd v. Ensey et al
as 5:2020cv00718
Defendant:
Tiffany Adams, FNU Sissom, Core Civic and others
Plaintiff:
Willie Jerome Boyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
