Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Meeks v. Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services
as 1:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Wilton Clinton Meeks, III
Defendant:
Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Baker v. Skipper et al
as 6:2020cv00010
Defendant:
Officer Wilton Creamer, Officer Alexis Lloyd and Officer Dustin Skipper
Plaintiff:
Bruce Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rayner v. Appling County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2019cv00048
Plaintiff:
Dinetha L. Rayner
Defendant:
Wilton Edwards, Kacey Newberry, Jeffery Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clarke v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2019cv00767
Defendant:
Patrick Labat, John Doe, City of Atlanta and others
Plaintiff:
Wilton Clarke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simms v. Attorney General of the United States et al
as 5:2017cv00006
Petitioner:
Anthony Wilton Simms
Respondent:
Attorney General of the United States , Tracy Johns and Brett R. Rinehart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Perez v. A Pension Store, LLC et al
as 1:2015mi00070
Petitioner:
Thomas E. Perez
Respondent:
A Pension Store, LLC, Pension Service Company, Sanders Legal Group and others
Meeks v. Nalley
as 1:2013mc00001
Plaintiff:
Wilton Clinton Meeks, III
Defendant:
Earl C. Nalley, Jr.
The Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Atlanta et al v. Sebelius et al
as 1:2012cv03489
Plaintiff:
The Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Atlanta , The Most Reverend Wilton D. Gregory , Christ the King Catholic School and others
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius, Hilda Solis, Timothy Geithner and others
Massengill et al v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company et al
as 1:2011cv04259
Plaintiff:
Wilton Rudolph Massengill and Linda E. Massengill
Defendant:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company , JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. , Prommis Solutions, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
