Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Maxwell v. United States of America
as 2:2019cv08008
Petitioner:
Kirk V. Maxwell and William Vincent Windsor
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00215
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Windsor v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv00391
Plaintiff:
Lorie Anne Windsor
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Windsor v. Colvin (CONSENT)
as 1:2013cv00587
Plaintiff:
Mary Windsor
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv04066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Pugh et al v. Forex Capital Trading Partners Inc et al
as 2:2012cv03668
Plaintiff:
Bennett L Pugh , Richard Reeder , Shelly Reeder and others
Defendant:
Forex Capital Trading Partners Inc, Mike Brady and Windsor Brokers Ltd
Cause Of Action: 7 U.S.C. § 25 Fraud - Commodities Leverage Contracts
Hacker v. Walls et al
as 4:2012cv02980
Plaintiff:
Timothy Ray Hacker
Defendant:
Scott Walls, Jason Windsor and Marshall County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01130
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Heflin v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 2:2011cv03320
Plaintiff:
Windsor Heflin
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Delaney Development, Inc. et al v. Landmark American Insurance Company et al
as 1:2011cv00500
Plaintiff:
Delaney Development, Inc. , Yester Oaks Apartments , Windsor Place Apartments and others
Defendant:
Landmark American Insurance Company, Mt. Hawley Insurance Company and Illinois Union Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
