Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Edmonds v. Phoenix, City of et al
as 2:2022cv00912
Plaintiff:
Winston Veodust Edmonds
Defendant:
Phoenix, City of and Maricopa County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edmonds v. Unknown Party
as 2:2021cv00907
Respondent:
Unknown Party
Petitioner:
Winston Veodust Edmonds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Edmonds v. Unknown Party et al
as 4:2021cv00024
Defendant:
Contract Facility Health Administrators, Centrion Health Services Contractor and Unknown Party
Plaintiff:
Winston Veodust Edmonds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edmonds v. Thompson et al
as 2:2018cv01879
Petitioner:
Winston Veodust Edmonds
Respondent:
Gerald Thompson, Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Edmonds #096224 v. Bucholz et al
as 2:2017cv04645
Plaintiff:
Winston Veodust Edmonds
Defendant:
Unknown Bucholz, Unknown Thompson, Unknown Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edmonds #96224 v. Social Security Administration et al
as 2:2017cv04226
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Arizona Department of Economic Security and Mercy Maricopa Integrated Care
Plaintiff:
Winston Veodust Edmonds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edmonds #96224 v. Brnovich et al
as 2:2017cv03965
Plaintiff:
Winston Veodust Edmonds
Defendant:
Mark Brnovich, Stephen Fuller, Vincent Adam Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Edmonds #96224 v. Attorney General of the State of Arizona
as 2:2017cv02845
Petitioner:
Winston Veodust Edmonds
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Edmonds #96224 v. Fuller et al
as 2:2017cv02827
Petitioner:
Winston Veodust Edmonds
Respondent:
Stephen Fuller, Vincent Carter, Mark Brnovich and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Edmonds #96224 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2017cv02847
Plaintiff:
Winston Veodust Edmonds
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Corizon Health, Unknown Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
