Cases 1 - 10 of 124
De Los Santos Martinez v. 11 Kitchen Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02851
Plaintiff:
Cornelio De Los Santos Martinez
Defendant:
11 Kitchen Inc. doing business as Wok Wok Southeast Asian Kitchen and Erik Cheah
Goodrum v. Wok Restaurant Owners
as 24-1638
Plaintiff:
MITCHELL KEITH GOODRUM
Defendant:
WOK RESTAURANT OWNERS
Goodrum v. Wok Restaurant Owners
as 3:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Keith Goodrum
Defendant:
Wok Restaurant Owners
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Goodrum v. Wok Restaurant Owners
as 2:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Keith Goodrum
Defendant:
Wok Restaurant Owners
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Lan v. 1353 Kingston Wok LLC et al
as 7:2023cv10005
Plaintiff:
Dounfuh Lan
Defendant:
1353 Kingston Wok LLC doing business as Kingston Wok and Junxing Pan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Pineda v. Happy Group Chinese Restaurant Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv08419
Plaintiff:
Fredy Pineda
Defendant:
Happy Group Chinese Restaurant Inc., Ni Yong, Wong Sai and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03340
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act - Civil Enforcement Actions
Prepared Food Photos, Inc. v. Kosher Bite Inc.
as 1:2023cv00781
Plaintiff:
Prepared Food Photos, Inc. and Adlife Marketing & Communications Co., Inc.
Defendant:
Kosher Bite Inc. doing business as KB Grill & Wok
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement (definitions)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2023cv80400
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv07121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
