Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Enos v. Lowther et al
as 5:2023cv00052
Plaintiff:
Sheila R. Enos
Defendant:
Sandra Lowther, Michael Wong and Harrisonburg Redevelopment and Housing Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Wong v. House of Shanghai, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00585
Plaintiff:
Joyce Y Wong and Yuet-Ying Chan
Defendant:
House of Shanghai, Inc. and Sachiko M Yahashi
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00485
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Stotts v. Wong
as 5:2023cv00001
Plaintiff:
Stephanie M. Stotts
Defendant:
Michael G. Wong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Wong v. Streeval
as 7:2022cv00171
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Wong
Respondent:
J.C. Streeval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wudi Industrial (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. v. Wong
as 1:2020cv00908
Defendant:
Wai L. Wong
Plaintiff:
Wudi Industrial (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1071
Wudi Industrial (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. v. Wong
as 1:2020cv00909
Defendant:
Wai L. Wong
Plaintiff:
Wudi Industrial (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1071
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America v. Fire Safety Systems, Inc.
as 1:2020cv00795
Plaintiff:
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America
Defendant:
Fire Safety Systems, Inc. and WK Tang, Inc. d/b/a China Wong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wong v. Breckons
as 7:2020cv00037
Respondent:
Breckons
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Wong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Broderick et al v. Capital One Financial Corp. et al
as 1:2019cv01454
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Hernandez, Kristina Mentone, Mark Miller and others
Defendant:
Capital One Bank (USA), Amazon Web Services, Inc., Capital One Financial Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
