Cases 11 - 20 of 298
Johnston v. Carle Health et al
as 1:2024cv01020
Plaintiff:
Suzanne L Johnston
Defendant:
Carle Health, OSF Hospitals, Sharon Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Bertha v. Kane County et al
as 1:2024cv00377
Plaintiff:
David A Bertha
Defendant:
Kane County, DeKalb County, Lake County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv16901
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02277
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv16316
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Valerie Flores v. Allen Horn, et al
as 23-3213
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VALERIE L. FLORES
Defendant / Appellee:
ALLEN HORN, Dane County Deputy Sheriff, CORY WOODS, Dane County Deputy Sheriff, HOPE BARAJAS, G2 Secure Staff and others
Miles v. Garland et al
as 4:2023cv04193
Plaintiff:
Harry Edwin Miles
Defendant:
Merrick B Garland, Dara L Darrow, Joe Billy McDade and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
BOWMAN v. STANLEY et al
as 1:2023cv01794
Plaintiff:
KAI A BOWMAN
Defendant:
SETH STANLEY, JOSEPH SHAFER, TAYLOR BAUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv14496
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
