Cases 1 - 10 of 97
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rice v. Ivey et al
as 2:2023cv01382
Plaintiff:
Brian K Rice
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Kenneth Boswell, Ray L Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hooks et al v. Alabama Department of Human Resources et al
as 2:2023cv00369
Plaintiff:
Robert Hooks, Ashley Hooks, L. H. and others
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Human Resources, Nancy Buckner, Michelle Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00384
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00297
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Eady v. Lieutenant Davis et al
as 1:2022cv00383
Plaintiff:
Cecelia Eady
Defendant:
Lieutenant Davis, Reosha Butler, Michael Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Baugh et al v. Austal USA, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00329
Plaintiff:
Paul David Baugh, Jr., David Dudley, Carl Skipper and others
Defendant:
Austal U.S.A., L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
