Cases 11 - 20 of 31
WOOD v. YORK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2016cv00600
Plaintiff:
JAMES LEE WOOD
Defendant:
YORK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and WILLIAM KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOOD et al v. YORK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 2:2016cv00601
Plaintiff:
JAMES LEE WOOD
Defendant:
YORK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and WILLIAM KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUTCHINS et al v. BROADWAY VETERINARY CLINIC et al
as 1:2016cv00282
Plaintiff:
BONNY LOU BUZZELL HUTCHINS and FOXY WOGILLS PRANCIE
Defendant:
BROADWAY VETERINARY CLINIC, BREWER VETERINARY CLINIC PA, MEADOW WOOD ANIMAL CLINIC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MID-CONTINENT CASUALTY COMPANY v. EARTH CARE PRODUCTS INC et al
as 1:2015cv00152
Plaintiff:
MID-CONTINENT CASUALTY COMPANY
Defendant:
EARTH CARE PRODUCTS INC, ANDREW LIVINGSTON, NATHAN COLTRANE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00436
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
WOOD v. USA
as 1:2014cv00399
Plaintiff:
APRIL M WOOD
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
MERRILL v. WOOD
as 1:2014cv00363
Plaintiff:
DOROTHY JEAN MERRILL
Defendant:
CATHERINE WOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00353
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AUBURN SEWERAGE DISTRICT v. VACTOR MANUFACTURING INC et al
as 2:2014cv00231
Plaintiff:
AUBURN SEWERAGE DISTRICT
Defendant:
VACTOR MANUFACTURING INC , NAVISTAR INC and CN WOOD CO INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HENDERSON v. THRASH et al
as 1:2014cv00202
Plaintiff:
KEITH HENDERSON
Defendant:
THOMAS W THRASH, JR, STEPHEN J MURPHY, III, CAROL COHRON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
