Cases 11 - 20 of 108
Woods v. Green et al
as 6:2022cv06281
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Charles Woods
Defendant:
Michael C. Green, Jack Elliot and Sandra Doorley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00381
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Wood v. Sun Life and Health Insurance Company
as 1:2022cv00237
Plaintiff:
Anne Wood
Defendant:
Sun Life and Health Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Wood v. Crandell et al
as 6:2021cv06667
Plaintiff:
Shane Wood
Defendant:
Officer Crandell and Officer Simpson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gentile v. Latona et al
as 1:2021cv01100
Plaintiff:
Joseph J. Gentile, Jr.
Defendant:
L. Latona, Edward Burnett, John Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United for Amherst et al v. Zellner et al
as 1:2021cv00958
Petitioner:
United for Amherst, Ray Herman, Jay Dispisquale and others
Defendant:
Commissioner Jeremy Zellner and Commissioner Ralph M. Mohr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Woods v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2021cv06504
Plaintiff:
Rolland Woods and Rolland G. Woods
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Pan et al v. City of Niagara Falls et al
as 1:2020cv01896
Defendant:
Niagara Falls Water Board, State of New York, County of Niagara and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond C. Pan, South Woods Funding, Inc. and Elite IT Solution, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wood v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2020cv06981
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Chyna Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Clark v. Phillips et al
as 6:2020cv06926
Defendant:
C.O. Scott Phillips, Sgt. W. Adam, Jr., C.O. S. Wood and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
