Cases 11 - 20 of 261
Burrell v. McIntyre et al
as 9:2023cv00392
Plaintiff:
Ako K. Burrell
Defendant:
Joe McIntyre, J. Spence, Sergeant Congregor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randall v. Renzi et al
as 9:2022cv01381
Petitioner:
Jarrod Carl Randall
Respondent:
Hon. Judge Eugene Renzi, Kristopher Sterns, Kim Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Stroming v. United States of America et al
as 5:2022cv01253
Plaintiff:
John G. Stroming
Defendant:
United States of America, George F. Hildebrandt, New York State Police and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
New York State Gaming Commission v. Artemiev et al
as 1:2022cv01140
Plaintiff:
New York State Gaming Commission
Defendant:
Peter Artemiev, Anabelle Eckert and Brian Wood Exclusive, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00876
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00873
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00883
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Francis v. City of Albany, et al.
as 1:2022cv00783
Plaintiff:
Shane Francis
Defendant:
City of Albany, City of Albany Police Department, Jesse Mall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00760
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00745
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
