Cases 61 - 70 of 131
Webster v. Nelson et al
as 6:2016cv00232
Defendant:
Deputy Barkhurst, Deputy Brown, Lt. Gill and others
Plaintiff:
Darren James Webster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wood v. Oregon One Inc.
as 1:2015cv02326
Defendant:
Oregon One Inc.
Plaintiff:
Debbie Wood
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Woods et al v. Staton et al
as 3:2015cv02169
Defendant:
Judge Eric Bergstrom, Chaplan Kyle and Sheriff D. Staton
Plaintiff:
Clifford Lucas and Laurence Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clardy v. Hascall et al
as 2:2015cv02098
Defendant:
Jason Bell, Cathy Bryant-Kaae, Timothy Coleman and others
Plaintiff:
Sir Giorgio Sanford Clardy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Woods et al
as 6:2015cv01336
Respondent:
Marissa Foster and Jeff Woods
Petitioner:
Teresa Lea Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01292
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Woods v. Meadows et al
as 6:2015cv00954
Defendant:
Lydick and Meadows
Plaintiff:
Burl Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States Department of Labor v. Buller et al
as 3:2015cv00747
Defendant:
Charles W. Buller, Park Place Wood Products, Inc. and Park Place Wood Products, Inc. Retirement Savings Plan
Plaintiff:
United States Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Brunelle v. Lincoln County School District
as 3:2015cv00324
Defendant:
Ron Beck, Karen Bondley, Angela Bowen and others
Plaintiff:
Jill Brunelle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00055
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
