Cases 11 - 20 of 148
Mathis v. Woods et al
as 1:2022cv01180
Plaintiff:
Carlos D. Mathis
Defendant:
Unit Manager Woods, Unit Sgt. Mann, Lt. Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoover v. State of Tennessee et al
as 1:2022cv01175
Plaintiff:
Shaun J. Hoover
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Eric Bryant, Tracy Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv00440
Petitioner:
Joshua A. Woods
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Ray v. Henderson County, Tennessee et al
as 1:2022cv01094
Plaintiff:
Patrick Ray
Defendant:
Henderson County, Tennessee, Judge Steve Beal, 26th District Public Defender's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilliam v. Carmon et al
as 2:2021cv00197
Plaintiff:
Travis Scott Gilliam
Defendant:
Carmon, John Dugger, Butch Gallan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. United States of America
as 3:2021cv00874
Petitioner:
Joshua Woods
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Brooks v. Memphis Police Department et al
as 2:2021cv02725
Plaintiff:
Unique Brooks
Defendant:
Memphis Police Department, Kenneth Southerland, D. Cherry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Strand v. Harville et al
as 2:2021cv00159
Plaintiff:
Robert Samuel Strand
Defendant:
James Harville, Chris Harville, C. Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hudson v. City of Memphis et al
as 2:2021cv02547
Plaintiff:
Mateem Malik Hudson
Defendant:
City of Memphis, Tennessee, Inc., CoreCivic, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitehair v. Tennessee, State of et al
as 3:2020cv00917
Respondent:
Ruth Woods, Tennessee, State of and Dena Davis
Petitioner:
Matthew Whitehair
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
