Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Presbury et al v. Ezell et al
as 1:2022cv01951
Plaintiff:
Montegua Presbury and Keaun Neville
Defendant:
Cameron Ezell and Environmental Works, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Laminate Works, Inc. v. Professional Installation Network, Inc.
as 2:2022cv02270
Plaintiff:
Laminate Works, Inc.
Defendant:
Professional Installation Network, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02287
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Lynch v. CRC Industries, et al
as 20-1404
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAURI LYNCH
Defendant / Appellee:
B'LASTER CORPORATION, TIEJIN LIMITED, CRC INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Prince v. The Intercept et al
as 2:2020cv00084
Defendant:
Matthew Cole, Alex Emmons, First Look Media Works Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Erik Prince
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00263
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Boilermakers National Health and Welfare Fund et al v. Eye Works, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv02572
Plaintiff:
John Fultz and Boilermakers National Health and Welfare Fund
Defendant:
Eye Works, Inc. and Cheryl Gibson
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Boilermakers National Health and Welfare Fund et al v. Eye Works, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv02549
Plaintiff:
John Fultz and Boilermakers National Health and Welfare Fund
Defendant:
Eye Works, Inc. and Cheryl Gibson
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Lynch v. CRC Industries, Inc.
as 1:2019cv02399
Plaintiff:
Lauri Lynch
Defendant:
CRC Industries, Inc., Tiejin Limited, Zoltek Companies, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00014
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
