Cases 1 - 7 of 7
HAMBY v. WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE, INC. GROUP DISABILITY INCOME POLICY et al
as 1:2013cv01156
Plaintiff:
PAULETTE HAMBY
Defendant:
LIBERTY LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF BOSTON and WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE, INC. GROUP DISABILITY INCOME POLICY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104 Recovery of Benefits to Employee
LOCKHART et al v. EXAMONE WORLD WIDE, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv00037
Defendant:
EXAMONE WORLD WIDE, INC., LabOne, INC. and QUEST DIAGNOSTICS CLINICAL LABORATORIES, INC.
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE LOCKHART and ERICA SHICK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Westlake v. Hreha et al
as 4:2010cv00081
Plaintiff:
Mark A Westlake and Melissa L Westlake
Defendant:
Daniel Hreha, Jr and Ace World Wide Moving and Storage Co Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ironrod Investments Inc v. World Wide Group LLC, The et al
as 1:2010cv00293
Plaintiff:
Ironrod Investments Inc
Defendant:
World Wide Group LLC The, John Kruse and Roderick Egan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ATLAS VAN LINES, INC. v. SIGNATURE WORLD WIDE RELOCATION-NASSAU LONG ISLAND, INC
as 3:2010cv00038
Plaintiff:
ATLAS VAN LINES, INC.
Defendant:
SIGNATURE WORLD WIDE RELOCATION - NEWBURGH INC. and SIGNATURE WORLD WIDE RELOCATION-NASSAU LONG ISLAND, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
WORLD WIDE STREET PREACHERS' FELLOWSHIP et al v. BALLARD et al
as 1:2009cv00506
Plaintiff:
WORLD WIDE STREET PREACHERS' FELLOWSHIP, WORLD WIDE STREET PREACHERS' FELLOWSHIP, DAVID ICKES and others
Defendant:
GREGORY A. BALLARD, MICHAEL J. O'CONNOR, OFFICER BARBIERI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chapa et al v. Wolverine World Wide Inc
as 2:2007cv00351
Plaintiff:
Frank Chapa and Sandra Chapa
Defendant:
Wolverine World Wide Inc and Wolverine World Wide Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
