Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01438
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01329
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1447 Hearings on Denials of Applications for Naturalization
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01244
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00680
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Rust v. Fernandez et al
as 1:2023cv00147
Plaintiff:
Clark Rust
Defendant:
Sgt. FNU Fernandez, C/O FNU Holden, Aubrie Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Friar v. Wray et al
as 2:2023cv00004
Plaintiff:
Joshua Thomas Friar
Defendant:
Amy Wray, Tosha Hickey, Tess Harn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00698
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Newton et al v. United State of America et al
as 1:2022cv00150
Plaintiff:
Ralph Mark Newton and Firearms Policy Coalition, Inc.
Defendant:
United State of America, Merrick Garland, Christopher A. Wray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01811
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Hejazi v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 6:2019cv01553
Defendant:
Lane County, Ellen Rosenblum, State of Oregon and others
Plaintiff:
Hamid Michael Hejazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
