Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Sun v. Zeve
as 1:2018cv02749
Plaintiff:
Xiu Jian Sun
Defendant:
Oren L. Zeve
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, Servant: Xiu Jian Sun, the Spiritual Adam v. Stephen Mullkoff, Esq. Demidchk Law Firm, P.L.L.C.
as 1:2018cv02751
Plaintiff:
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, Servant: Xiu Jian Sun, the Spiritual Adam
Defendant:
Stephen Mullkoff, Esq. Demidchk Law Firm, P.L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints et al v. Chatigny
as 3:2017cv02066
Plaintiff:
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints and Xiu Jian Sun
Defendant:
Robert N. Chatigny
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Sun v. New York State Attorney Genera
as 17-3697
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Xiu Jian Sun, Servant of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints; The Spiritual Adam
Defendant - Appellee:
New York State Attorney General, Charles F. Sanders, (Wang Xing Ren), Michael Siudzinski, (Wang Xing Ren) & Office of the Attorney General of NY and others
Sun v. Supreme Court of the State of
as 17-3246
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Xiu Jian Sun, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, Servant
Defendant - Appellee:
Supreme Court of Queens County, Preliminary Conference Part
Sun v. Chow
as 17-3249
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Xiu Jian Sun
Defendant - Appellee:
H. Chow, City of New York Human Resources Administration Family Independence Administration and Denise David, City of New York Human Resources Administration Family Independence Administration
SUN v. OBAMA BARACK-DOG et al
as 1:2017cv01861
Plaintiff:
XIU JIAN SUN
Defendant:
OBAMA BARACK-DOG, P. DAVIS OLIVER, BENJAMIN C. MIZER and others
Cause Of Action: 10 U.S.C. § 1006
CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS et al v. TRUMP
as 1:2017cv01787
Plaintiff:
CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS and XIU JIAN SUN
Defendant:
DONALD JOHN TRUMP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
