Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00880
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00304
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Liu et al v. Chau et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv06369
Plaintiff: CHEN HUA LIU and CHEN XIA LIU
Defendant: Tu Kang Yang, Wing Fung Home Realty Group Inc., Wing Fung Chau and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act
Liu et al v. Yung, Esq. et al
as 1:2020cv02234
Defendant: Keith Ngan-Kit Yung, Esq. and Yung & Associates, P.C.
Plaintiff: Chen Hua Liu and Chen Xia Liu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
Nolasco v. JTG International, Inc. et al
as 8:2016cv04129
Plaintiff: Jose Yobianki Nolasco Nolasco
Defendant: JTG International, Inc. , Tong Xia Liu, Gui Xun Chen and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Liu et al v. Kangaroo Pak Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv01795
Defendant: John Does and Jane Does # 1-10, Kangaroo Pak Inc. and Eric Tang
Plaintiff: Jing Bo Lai, Xin Xia Liu and Guang Liang Zhang
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv06506
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv08020
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
LIU, DBA CITY CENTER DENTAL et al v. JR INVESTMENTS, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv00602
Defendant: JR INVESTMENTS, LLC and J. Ravain
Plaintiff: XIA LIU, DBA CITY CENTER DENTAL and Lilly Liu
Liu v. Holder
as 11-934
Petitioner: Yun Xia Liu
Respondent: Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?