Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04562
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Nike, Inc. et al v. www.perfectkicks.me et al
as 1:2021cv00248
Defendant:
www.airjordan1og.com, www.perfectkicks.me, www.fyysports.co and others
Plaintiff:
Nike, Inc. and Converse Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Richemont International SA et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2017cv01411
Plaintiff:
Richemont International SA , Cartier International A.G. , Montblanc-Simplo GMBH and others
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Zhang Ming, zou yulan and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00274
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Richemont International SA et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2016cv07991
Plaintiff:
Richemont International SA, Cartier International A.G., Montblanc-Simplo GMBH and others
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", zheng xiao, zheng xiao (2) and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Lin v. Holder
as 11-3745
Petitioner:
Xue Lin
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Lin v. Holder
as 11-3063
Petitioner:
Ying Xue Lin
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv02697
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
