Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Jiang v. Garland
as 24-278
Petitioner:
YING JIANG
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00551
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05362
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv04214
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
NYANIFY, Inc., et al. v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto
as 1:2021cv00153
Plaintiff:
TRADEMARK HOLDER IDENTIFIED IN EXHIBIT 1 HERETO and Trademark Holder Identified in Exhibit 1
Defendant:
THE INDIVIDUALS, CORPORATIONS, LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES, PARTNERSHIPS AND UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE A HERETO, shagaiyioump, FGJ-BVM21 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv01583
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Abad et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11929
Plaintiff:
Frank Lipari, David Solorzano, Antonio Rosa and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Jiang v. Session
as 17-2165
Petitioner:
Xiong Ying Jiang
Respondent:
Jefferson B. Sessions III, United States Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01457
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Ying Jiang v. Jeff Sessions
as 17-60082
Petitioner:
YING JIANG
Respondent:
JEFF SESSIONS, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
