Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Bai et al v. CMB Export Infrastructure Investment Group 48, LP et al
as 2:2024at00303
Plaintiff:
Shi Bai, Jing Cai, Yikun Cai and others
Defendant:
CMB Export Infrastructure Investment Group 48, LP, CMB Export LLC, NK Immigration Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bai et al v. CMB Export Infrastructure Investment Group 48, LP et al
as 2:2024cv00807
Plaintiff:
Shi Bai, Jing Cai, Yikun Cai and others
Defendant:
CMB Export Infrastructure Investment Group 48, LP, CMB Export LLC, NK Immigration Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
In Re Naturalization Ceremony 2/11/2023
as 3:2023mc80027
In Re:
In Re Naturalization Ceremony, Milan Aggarwal, Namrata Saidas Naik and others
(PS)Wang v. Mayorkas et al
as 2:2022cv00135
Plaintiff:
Ying Wang
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, UR M. Jaddou and Emilia Bardini
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Wang v. Jaddou et al
as 2:2021cv01251
Plaintiff:
Ying Wang
Defendant:
Ur Mendoza Jaddou and US Citizenship and Immigration Services
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Whitford v. US
as 21-1394
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THORNWOOD FUND, DENISE GRANDPRE, JOANA C. ANDERSON and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Oriental Dolphins Investments, LLC et al v. Kelly et al
as 1:2017cv05672
Plaintiff:
Oriental Dolphins Investments, LLC , Lidong Cao , Sitao Chen and others
Defendant:
John Kelly, James McCament, Nicholas Colucci and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Wang v. Session
as 17-1009
Petitioner:
Hai Ying Wang
Respondent:
Jefferson B. Sessions III, United States Attorney General
Ying Wang v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.
as 15-1427
Petitioner:
YING WANG
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General of the United States
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv04083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
