Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Young v. Wheelock et al
as 8:2024cv00079
Petitioner:
Marvin Young
Respondent:
Wheelock and State of Nebraska
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Young v. Boyd
as 4:2022cv03177
Petitioner:
Samuel Young
Respondent:
Taggart Boyd
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ravestein v. Douglas County, Nebraska et al
as 8:2021cv00442
Defendant:
Wellpath, LLC, Douglas County, Nebraska, Correct Care Solutions, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Colleen Ravestein
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lightfeather v. Ricketts et al
as 8:2021cv00165
Defendant:
Tony Vargas, Pete Ricketts, Kate Bowls and others
Plaintiff:
Austin Edward Lightfeather
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hartman v. Gray et al
as 4:2020cv03084
Defendant:
Tilson, Joy Gray and Ann Young
Plaintiff:
David Mark Hartman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Hansen
as 8:2018cv00372
Respondent:
Brad Hansen
Petitioner:
Larry Young
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Castor v. Frakes et al
as 4:2017cv03065
Plaintiff:
Wilma Lee Castor
Defendant:
Denise Davidson, Scott Frakes, Michael Rothwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Houston et al
as 8:2016cv00217
Defendant:
Francis Britten, Scott Busboom, Dr. Casebolt and others
Plaintiff:
Marvin L. Brown, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jo v. Six Unknown Names Agents et al
as 8:2015cv00052
Petitioner:
Ahmad Z. Adili, Erick Boch, Clive Cohen and others
Respondent:
Mr president of the United States Barack Obama and Six Unknown Names Agents
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Young v. USA
as 8:2013cv00333
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Nathan Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
