Cases 1 - 10 of 190
Young v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00552
Plaintiff:
David Allen Young
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Young v. Walmart, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02016
Plaintiff:
Constant Fitzgerld Young
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc. doing business as Walmart #2592, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Wal-Mart Neighborhood Market
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Young v. Ruiz et al
as 2:2023cv01790
Plaintiff:
Robert Young
Defendant:
J. Ruiz, Abrams and Tate William
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bang et al v. New Prime, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01428
Plaintiff:
Young Tae Bang and Eun Ha Joo
Defendant:
New Prime, Inc. and Jesus Elias Espinoza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Young v. Grootboom et al
as 2:2023cv01374
Plaintiff:
Mathew Young
Defendant:
Grootboom, c/o Thomas and Ashcraft
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Warden HDSP et al
as 2:2023cv01280
Petitioner:
Mathew Young
Respondent:
Warden HDSP and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Liebling v. Solomita et al
as 2:2023cv01273
Plaintiff:
Joshua Liebling
Defendant:
Daniel Solomita, Donald Danks, Louise Sams and others
Nominal Defendant:
Loop Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ard v. Nelson et al
as 2:2023cv01086
Plaintiff:
John Junior Ard
Defendant:
Casey J Nelson, Brandon Trout, Darren Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Young v. Rasosta et al
as 2:2023cv00974
Plaintiff:
Mathew Young
Defendant:
Violet R. Rasosta, Darin F. Imley and Judge Kierny
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
