Cases 1 - 10 of 131
In the Matter of the Application of Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
as 4:2024mc80070
Petitioner:
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
Respondent:
Yahoo Inc.
Thompson v. Tech Crunch, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv01242
Plaintiff:
Walter Thompson
Defendant:
Tech Crunch, Inc., Yahoo, Inc., Does 1-100 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
EVOX Productions, LLC v. Automattic Inc. et al
as 3:2023mc80298
In Re:
Automattic Inc.
Plaintiff:
EVOX Productions, LLC
Defendant:
Yahoo Inc.
Oliver v. EHM Productions, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv02671
Plaintiff:
Anthony Oliver
Defendant:
EHM Productions, Inc., Aabaco Small Business, L.L.C., Dotdash Media, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Wilfling v. Yahoo, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv02615
Plaintiff:
Michael Wilfling
Defendant:
Yahoo, Inc., DOES 1 through 10, and Yahoo, Inc. doing business as Yahoo News, a Delaware corporation
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Suraju et al v. Yahoo!, Inc. et al
as 3:2022mc80072
Plaintiff:
Olanrewaju Suraju and The Human and Environmental Development Agenda
Defendant:
Yahoo!, Inc. and J.P. Morgan Chase, Inc.
In re ex parte Application of Dr. Andr von Moos,
as 3:2021mc80258
In Re:
Dr. Andre von Moos
Defendant:
In Re
Not Classified By Court:
Google LLC and Yahoo Inc.
Xianhua v. Oath Holdings, Inc. f/k/a/Yahoo! Inc., et al
as 5:2020cv06185
Defendant:
JERRY YANG, TERRY SEMEL, OATH HOLDINGS, INC., f/k/a YAHOO! INC. and others
Plaintiff:
NING XIANHUA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
X17, Inc. v. Yahoo!, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv02683
Defendant:
Yahoo!, Inc. and Verizon Communications, Inc.
Plaintiff:
X-17, Inc. and X17, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Agardi v. Hyatt Corporation et al
as 3:2017cv05612
Plaintiff:
Julianna Agardi
Defendant:
Hyatt Hotels Corporation, Global Hyatt Corporation and Yahoo Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
