Cases 1 - 10 of 195
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03695
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Rush v. Helfrich et al
as 1:2024cv02971
Plaintiff:
Dennis Rush
Defendant:
Bryan Helfrich, Brandon Walls, David Haag and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02831
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv50106
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv50059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Young v. The City of Joliet et al
as 1:2024cv00487
Plaintiff:
Cecil Young
Defendant:
The City of Joliet and Joliet Police Detective Kristoff Petro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Montgomery et al v. Young et al
as 1:2023cv15677
Plaintiff:
Darius Montgomery and Lora Snapp
Defendant:
Timothy Young, Ryan Blaskey and City Of Aurora
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Young-Dawkins v. Ilana Grubel Kings County Family Court et al
as 1:2023cv05083
Plaintiff:
Christina Young-Dawkins
Defendant:
Ilana Grubel Kings County Family Court and Circuit Court of Cook County Clerk Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04305
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Wright v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv03298
Plaintiff:
Ervin Wright
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Ronald Watts, Brian Bolton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
