Cases 1 - 10 of 201
Jenkins v. Kim et al
as 1:2024cv03310
Plaintiff:
William J. Jenkins
Defendant:
Young Kim, Donna Petrauskis, Wellpath LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Chorito et al
as 1:2024cv02865
Plaintiff:
Ezekiel B Thompson
Defendant:
Chorito, Holgin, Rodway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bernard v. Carpenter et al
as 3:2024cv50097
Plaintiff:
Eric E. Bernard and Terrell King
Defendant:
Monica Carpenter, Susan Tuell, Dr. Sy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv50061
Plaintiff:
Travionte Williams
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Dr. J. Chess, Dr. M. Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abrams v. Chess et al
as 3:2024cv50007
Plaintiff:
Edward Abrams
Defendant:
Jamie Chess, Jennifer Hoffman, Ramon Marquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv16927
Plaintiff:
Kelsey D Jackson
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Boutay, Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Brookhart et al
as 1:2023cv16708
Petitioner:
Deshanta Young
Respondent:
Dee-Dee Brookhart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Santerilli et al
as 1:2023cv16303
Plaintiff:
Ce'Andre D Moore
Defendant:
Dale Santerilli, l Young Kim, City Of Joliet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malone v. Williams et al
as 3:2023cv50348
Plaintiff:
William Malone and Bill
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe, Tarry Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv03521
Plaintiff:
Romell Young
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Chicago Police Department and Terry Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
