Cases 11 - 20 of 365
Young v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00447
Plaintiff:
Liesha Young
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Young v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
Catherine Young
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Alford v. Schweitzer et al
as 2:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Alford
Defendant:
Warden Tom Schweitzer, Mr. C. Cann, Mr. Z. Gould and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chapman v. Franklin County Board of Commissioners et al
as 2:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Tasha Chapman
Defendant:
Franklin County Board of Commissioners, Commissioner John O'Grady, Kevin L Boyce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Young v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03984
Plaintiff:
Jane Young
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Young et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03958
Plaintiff:
Marty Young and Constance Young
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc., Bard Davol, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Young v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03738
Plaintiff:
Joseph E Young
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03265
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02821
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Youngs v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02844
Plaintiff:
Angel Youngs
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
