Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05490
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05176
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv01382
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Smith v. US
as 21-1431
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHIU YU CHANG, JOSEPH A. GARCIA, JEAN-FRANCOIS BONNETE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Kim v. Trumbull Insurance Company
as 2:2015cv14347
Plaintiff:
Yu Chang Kim
Defendant:
Trumbull Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Michael Resh, et al v. China Agritech, Inc., et al
as 15-55432
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL H. RESH, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, WILLIAM SCHOENKE, HEROCA HOLDING, B.V. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CHINA AGRITECH, INC., YU CHANG, Company,'s CEO, President, Secretary and , Chairman of the Board, YAU-SING TANG, Company's Chief Financial Officer, AKA Gareth Tang and others
Michael H. Resh et al v. China Agritech, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv05083
Defendant:
Gene Michael Bennett, Yu Chang, China Agritech, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Michael H. Resh
Kevin Smyth v. Yu Chang et al
as 2:2013cv03008
Defendant:
Gene Michael Bennett, Yu Chang, China Agritech Inc and others
Movant:
Kim Group, Robert Omes and Victor van de Reijt Holding BV
Plaintiff:
Gary Sandlass and Kevin Smyth
Smyth v. Chang et al
as 1:2012cv01262
Plaintiff:
Kevin Smyth
Defendant:
Yu Chang, Yau-Sing Tang, Xiao Rong Teng and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Rosemary Gearing et al v. China Agritech Inc et al
as 2:2012cv05039
Defendant:
Gene Michael Bennett, Yu Chang, China Agritech Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Rosemary Gearing and Thomas Gearing
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
