Cases 21 - 30 of 72
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv04665
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv03006
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Matthew E. Orso v. Todd Disner et al
as 2:2021mc00230
Defendant:
Trudy Gilmond, David Kettner, David Sorrells and others
Petitioner:
Nationwide Judgment Recovery Inc
Plaintiff:
Matthew E Orso In his capacity as court appointed Receiver for Rex Venture Group, LLC doing business as ZeekRewards.com and Matthew E. Orso in his capacity as court-appointed Receiver for Rex Venture Group LLC doing business as ZeekRewards.com
Nationwide Judgment Recovery Inc et al v. Todd Disner et al
as 2:2021mc00231
Defendant:
Trudy Gilmond, David Kettner, David Sorrells and others
Petitioner:
Nationwide Judgment Recovery Inc
Plaintiff:
Matthew E Orso In his capacity as court appointed Receiver for Rex Venture Group, LLC doing business as ZeekRewards.com
Wheby v. Greenland Acquisition Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv01758
Defendant:
Yanming Liu, Yu Chen, Shan Cui and others
Plaintiff:
Earl M. Wheby, Jr.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv05837
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 mn
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv02645
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv10696
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv05716
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jones v. Chen
as 1:2018cv02654
Plaintiff:
Rendy Jones
Defendant:
Hsin-Yu Chen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
