Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv08026
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv07300
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Liu v. Garland
as 22-6503
Petitioner: ZENG YU LIU
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Red Door Asian Bistro, et al v. City of Fort Lauderdale, et al
as 22-11489
Plaintiff / Appellant: RED DOOR ASIAN BISTRO, ANTONIO ASTA and ZHI YU LIU
Defendant / Appellee: CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE and CHIEF MECHANICAL INSPECTOR, CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02155
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv09137
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv04591
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Red Door Asian Bistro et al v. City of Ft. Lauderdale et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2019cv61308
Plaintiff: Zhi Yu liu, antonio asta and Red Door Asian Bistro
Defendant: City of Ft. Lauderdale and Robert Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00410
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CHANG et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2018cv00659
Plaintiff: YU-CHING CHANG , SARAH HSIN CHENG, SHIH-TING FANG and others
Defendant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, KIRSTJEN M. NIELSEN, U.S. CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?