Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv02876
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Manchester United Football Club Limited et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2021cv02140
Plaintiff:
Tottenham Hotspur Limited, The Liverpool Football Club and Athletic Grounds Limited and Manchester United Football Club Limited
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Polii000, zhaoxiaodong1970 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Lin v. Barr
as 19-4104
Respondent:
William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Yuan Lin
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv01554
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
United States of America v. LIN et al
as 3:2018cv02088
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
CAI YUAN LIN, RUYUN HONG, WENWEI LIN and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
LIU et al v. CHENG DU 23 INC et al
as 2:2017cv12867
Plaintiff:
YI CHING LIU , JI YUAN LIN , TECK KIM EU and others
Defendant:
CHENG DU 23 INC, FU RESTAURANT LLC, YONGYI JIANG and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Lin v. Lynch
as 16-3216
Petitioner:
Yuan Lin
Respondent:
Loretta E. Lynch, United States Attorney General
Jiang v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 1:2013cv00642
Plaintiff:
Yuan Lin Jiang
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A.
Lin v. Napolitano et al
as 1:2012cv08817
Plaintiff:
Yuan Lin
Defendant:
Janet Napolitano , Alejandro Mayorkas , David L. Roark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Innersvingen AS v. Sports Hoop, Inc., et al
as 12-56910
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellee:
INNERSVINGEN AS, a Norwegian limited company
Defendant-counter-claimant - Appellant:
SPORTS HOOP, INC., a California corporaiton and KUN YUAN LIN, an individual, AKA Kwan Lin
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
