Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Hernandez v. New Ho Wah Chinese Take Out Inc. et al
as 1:2025cv06610
Plaintiff:
Aquilino Hernandez
Defendant:
New Ho Wah Chinese Take Out Inc., Zhen Lin and John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv09639
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in Habeas Corpus: INS
United States of America v. Stroia (Mobley)
as 25-1793
Defendant:
JOHN MARTIN, SHI ZHEN LIN, GABRIEL STROIA and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cuomo v. The Partnerships And Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A,
as 1:2025cv00115
Plaintiff:
Rivers Cuomo
Defendant:
AnQingHaoXieShangMaoYouXianGongSi, bozhoushiyuanzhimanshangmaoyouxiangongsi, Caozheng Yuan Class and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03924
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv07322
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02765
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Juracan Quino et al v. New Ho Wah Chinese Take Out Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00648
Plaintiff:
Hector Miguel Juracan Quino
Defendant:
Zhen Lin, Dong Liu and New Ho Wah Chinese Take Out Inc. doing business as New Ho Wah
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
LIN v. TILLERY et al
as 2:2021cv00409
Plaintiff:
ZHEN LIN
Defendant:
SPENCER TILLERY, JR., UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RASIER-PA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
