Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04771
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Huang et al v. VJF Delivery Service Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv04866
Defendant:
VJF Delivery Service Inc. and Enrique Diaz
Plaintiff:
Zheng Jian Wan and Hai Le Huang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Nike, Inc. v. Wu
as 20-602
Defendant:
Martin Lessmann, Ming Yuan Mao Yi You Xian Gong Si, Ming Fang and others
Plaintiff:
Converse Inc. and Nike, Inc.
Appellee:
China Merchants Bank, Bank of Communications, Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited and others
Appellant:
Next Investments, LLC
Amicus Curiae:
Association of American Publishers, Inc., American Apparel & Footwear Association, Center for Anti-Counterfeiting and Product Protection and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00311
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rebel8 Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2015cv10829
Plaintiff:
Rebel8 Inc.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Zheng Jian Sheng, Aaron Otero and others
Garnishee:
Brand Men and Women Shoes Mall
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Nike, Inc. et al v. Wu
as 1:2013cv08012
Defendant:
Martin Lessmann, Ming Yuan Mao Yi You Xian Gong Si, Ming Fang and others
Plaintiff:
Converse Inc., Nike, Inc. and Assignee Next Investments, LLC
Interested Party:
Next Investments, LLC
Not Classified By Court:
Bank of Communications, China Merchants Bank, China Construction Bank and others
Debtor In Possession:
Zhan Ruping
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv04532
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
