Cases 1 - 10 of 90,866
Fields v. Todd East Law et al
as 2:2024cv00203
Defendant:
Sullivan Co. Jail, Social Security Administration, McKenzie and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Chad Fields
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Mowdy v. SSA, Commissioner of
as 2:2024cv00204
Plaintiff:
Brandy L. Mowdy
Defendant:
SSA, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
JPM Restaurant, LLC v. United States
as 1:2024cv00357
Defendant:
Dept of Treasury IRS United States
Plaintiff:
JPM Restaurant, LLC
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
FANTASTIC SAMS FRANCHISE CORPORATION v. DONMARCOS, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv02867
Plaintiff:
FANTASTIC SAMS FRANCHISE CORPORATION
Defendant:
DONMARCOS, LLC, DONALD HENSON and MARK PATTON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
MELSON v. UHS of Lakeside, LLC
as 2:2024cv02866
Defendant:
UHS of Lakeside, LLC
Plaintiff:
CLYDE MELSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Stacey v. City of Jasper et al
as 1:2024cv00356
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Ray Stacey
Defendant:
Lillian Michele Lockhart, Cody Pittman and City of Jasper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Alzeidyeen v. Nashville Wireless Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00373
Plaintiff:
Omar Alzeidyeen
Defendant:
Nashville Wireless Inc. and Bewar Mohamad
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Pacheco v. Martinez
as 2:2024cv02638
Respondent:
Lugarda Guzman Martinez
Petitioner:
Daniel Anas Pacheco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
