Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 3,196
Utica National Assurance Company v. Amazon.com Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv11267
Plaintiff: Utica National Assurance Company
Defendant: Amazon.com Services, Inc. as Successor in Interest to Amazon.com.DEDC, LLC, Amazon.com.DEDC, LLC and Amazon.com Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Type: Contract Insurance
Jill Bezek v. First National Bank of Pennsylvania
as 23-310
Petitioner: JILL BEZEK and MICHELLE HARRIS
Respondent: FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF PENNSYLVANIA, First Mariner Bank, successor in interest to First Mariner Bank by and through merger with Howard Bank
Jackson, et al. v. Germono, et al.
as 23-4408
Plaintiff / Appellee: PHYLLIS JACKSON and THE ESTATE OF MICHAEL WILSON, by and through its successor-in-interest Phyllis Jackson
Defendant / Appellant: MACY GERMONO, in her individual capacity, MARYLENE IBANEZ, in her individual capacity and ANIL KUMAR, in his individual capacity
Defendant: COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, WILLIAM GORE, VINCENT RONALD GATAN and others
Dennis v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation, et al.
as 23-4283
Plaintiff / Appellant: ROSA DENNIS, individually and as successor-in-interest to PATRICK W. DENNIS (Deceased)
Defendant / Appellee: FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION, FOSTER WHEELER LLC, IMO INDUSTRIES, INC., sued indvidually and as successor-in-interest to Delaval Steam Turbine Company and Delaval, Inc. and others
Defendant: AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, sued individually and as successor-by merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., AMTROL, INC., individually and as successor-in interest to H.A. TRUSH, VIACOMCBS INC., formerly known as CBS Corporation; formerly known as Viacom Inc successor by merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation; formerly known as Westinghouse Electric Corporation and others
Garcia, et al. v. Welltower OP LLC, et al.
as 23-4247
Plaintiff / Appellee: GILBERT GARCIA, by and through his successor in interest, Paul Garcia, PAUL GARCIA, individually, RONALD GARCIA, individually and others
Defendant / Appellant: WELLTOWER OP LLC, doing business as Sunrise Villa Bradford, SUNRISE SENIOR LIVING MANAGEMENT INC, DOES 1-100 and others
Juarez Zelaya v. City of Los Angeles, et al.
as 23-4186
Plaintiff / Appellee: NICOLE JUAREZ ZELAYA, Individually and as Successor in Interest to Decedent, Jacobo Juarez Cedillo
Defendant / Appellant: CITY OF LOS ANGELES, DUSTIN RICHMOND and JOSEPH HUNT
A., et al. v. County of San Bernardino, et al.
as 23-4180
Plaintiff / Appellee: J. A., a minor by and through his Guardian ad litem Cindy Plasencia, as successor in interest to Juan Antonio Ayon Ruiz, JOSE JUAN AYON ROMERO, parent of decedent and MARIA DOLORES RUIZ VASQUEZ, parent of decedent
Defendant / Appellant: COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, ED FAKHOURY, Deputy and BRANDON BECKER, Deputy
U.S. Bank Trust Company, N.A. v. Farias et al
as 5:2023cv01516
Plaintiff: U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association, as Trustee, as Successor-In-Interest to U.S. Bank National Association and U.S. Bank Trust Company, N.A.
Defendant: Elizabeth Sanchez Farias, Alma Rodriguez, Salvador Rodriguez, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Noland v. Energizer Auto Manufacturing, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv16598
Plaintiff: Jon R. Noland
Defendant: Energizer Auto Manufacturing, Inc. as successor-in-interest to STP Products Manufacturing Company, d/b/a STP, Safety-Kleen Systems, Inc., Shell USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
U.S. Bank Trust Company NA v. Tunzi et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv02619
Plaintiff: U.S. Bank Trust Company N.A., as trustee, as successor in interest to U.S Bank N.A., successor trustee to Lasalle Bank National Association, on behalf of the holders of Bear Stearns Asset Backed Secur and U.S. Bank Trust Company N.A.
Defendant: Joseph Tunzi, Vincent Tunzi, Jr., Jennifer Jo Ferrell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?