Cases 31 - 40 of 2,802
TerBorg v. Martuscello
as 6:2024cv06106
Petitioner:
Jeffrey TerBorg
Respondent:
D. Martuscello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richards v. D. Barnes #823 et al
as 1:2024cv01186
Plaintiff:
David Richards
Defendant:
D. Barnes #823, Kim Salm Inmate Coordinator and Lieutenant Michael Slack #125
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lincoln v. USA
as 6:2024cv06104
Petitioner:
Matthew D. Lincoln
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Harris v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
Maurice D. Harris
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lasher v. Conroy et al
as 1:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Brian Lasher
Defendant:
Amber Conroy, City of Niagara Falls, New York, City of Niagara Falls Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lasher v. Conroy et al
as 6:2024cv06065
Plaintiff:
Brian Lasher
Defendant:
Amber Conroy, City of Niagara Falls, New York, City of Niagara Falls Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sierra v. Covello et al
as 9:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Francisco Sierra
Defendant:
Patrick Covello, E. Baskerville, M. Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Slade v. City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv00514
Plaintiff:
Ricco D. Slade
Defendant:
City of New York, NYPD, NYCD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arrington v. New York State et al
as 9:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Gary Arrington
Defendant:
New York State and D. G. Uhler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cole v. Ber- Berlin FCI et al
as 1:2024cv00335
Plaintiff:
Jim Scott Cole
Defendant:
Ber- Berlin FCI, Team Quebec, N. Cairns- U/M and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
