Cases 1 - 10 of 177
M. et al v. Azar et al
as 2:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
Michaela M., Gabriel M., Kinley G. and others
Defendant:
Stephanie M. Azar and Jean W. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00733
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 Education: Handicapped Child Act Procedural Safeguards
J. v. Montgomery County Board of Education et al
as 2:2023cv00706
Plaintiff:
C.D.J. and C. D. J.
Defendant:
Montgomery County Board of Education, Melvin J. Brown, Brian Thornton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00674
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Bush et al v. Alabama Department of Human Resources et al
as 2:2023cv00673
Plaintiff:
Adam Bush, Delsea Creel, L. C. and others
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Human Resources, Nancy Buckner, Dan Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00662
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act
Daniel v. Alabama Crime Victims Compensation (MAG+)
as 2:2023cv00618
Plaintiff:
Antuane D. Daniel, Sr.
Defendant:
Alabama Crime Victims Compensation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daniel v. Montgomery Police Department (MAG+)
as 2:2023cv00619
Plaintiff:
Antuane D. Daniel, Sr.
Defendant:
Montgomery Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daniel v. Empire Properties (MAG+)
as 2:2023cv00617
Plaintiff:
Antuane D. Daniel, Sr.
Defendant:
Empire Properties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00567
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12111 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
